Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26703/jct.v6i2.330Keywords:
Information Technology, Organisation StructureAbstract
A lot of money is invested by organization to develop a meaningful information system that can serve their purpose. But the status of end user and their information required present a set of unique and different problem that need to be overcome. The environmental success of this kind of information system model is affected by various factors like people, activity and system involved in development cycle, apart from the rest of element used in their development cycle.This paper in prepared to develop effective computerized information system model by displaying how the people, activity, and system can influence the model by associating or non associating with the model. This paper also highlights the relation between these factors. The element making up the framework can be summarized in 3 words: people, activities and systems. These elements form the main components of the information system model. They are the elements within an organization, which have an effect on and describe the development and usage of information system model. The framework is described using set theory. Each of these 3 components is assumed as sets containing element present in an organization during system development.
Downloads
Metrics
References
B. McNurlin and R. H. Jr. Sprague : “Information Systems, management in practice.” (2nd Ed.). Prentice-Hall International Editions, 1989.
J. F. Rockart and M. Treacy: “The CEO Goes On-line.” Harvard Business Review, 60 (1), Jan-Feb. 1982.
I. Millet, C. H. Mawhinney and E. A. Kallman: “A Path Framework for Executive Information Systems.” Transactions of the Eleventh International Conference on Decision Support Systems, 1991.
L. Belcher and H. Watson: “Assessing the Value of Conoco’s CBIS.” MIS Quarterly Vol. 17, No. 3,September 1993.
A. Paller and R. Laska: “The CBIS book.” Dow Jones-Irwing, Homewood, IL, 1990.
A. J. Ryan: “Cost of CBIS is a big deal for most firms.” Computerworld, July 24, 1989, p. 46.
H. Watson and M. Frolick: “Determining Information Requirements for an CBIS.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 3, September 1993.
K. Lyytinen and R. Hirschheim: Information Systems Failures -” Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, Vol. 4, pp. 257-309, Oxford University Press, 1987.
S. Alter and M. Ginzberg: “Managing uncertainty in MIS implementation.” Sloan Management Review, Vol. 19, pp. 23-31, 1978.
H. C. Lucas: “Why information systems fail.”” Columbia University Press, New York, 1975.
M. L Markus: “Power, politics, and MIS implementation.” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26
D. Delong and J. F. Rockart: “Identifying the Attributes of Successful Executive Support System Implementation” in H. Watson, R. K. Rainer and G. Houdeshel “Executive Information Systems: Emergence, Development, Impact.” Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
R. H. Jr. Sprague: “A framework for the development of Decision Support Systems.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 4, December 1980, pp. 1-26.
I. Meiklejohn “The executive information systems Report.” Business Intelligence, 1989.
H. Watson, R. K. Rainer and C. E. Koh: “Executive Information Systems: A framework for Development and a Survey of Current Practices.” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 1, March 1991.
W. J. Orlikowski and D. Robey: “Information Technology and the Structuring of organizations.” Information Systems Research. Vol. 2, 1991, pp. 143-169.
M. Jones and Nandhakumar: “Structured Development? A structurational analysis of the development of an Executive Information System” Research Papers in Management Studies,University of Cambridge, No. 5, 1992-1993.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2011 Journal of Commerce and Trade
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.